Bigg Boss 6 Telugu: High Court's Key Comments On The Bigg Boss Show... If They Are Doing This On Purpose, That Is The Question.

Categorized under Entertainment
Image of Bigg Boss 6 Telugu: High Courts Key Comments On The Bigg Boss Show... If They Are Doing This On Purpose, That Is The Question.

Ordering the federal and state governments to present all relevant information on this show, adjourning the hearing to this month's 27th. She also said that before we know what would happen in this, we will have to watch one or two episodes.

The Bigg Boss season of the most popular reality programme on television is still going strong. On the other hand, on Tuesday, the High Court heard the petition filed against Esho. Adjourning the hearing till the 27th of this month and requiring the central and state governments to give detailed details about this show. She also stated that we will watch one or two episodes before learning what would happen in this.On Tuesday, a bench comprised of High Court Chief Justice (CJ) Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice DVSS Somayazul issued orders to such effect. Ketireddy Jagadeeswara Reddy, a producer and social crusader, has filed a PIL in the High Court saying that the Bigg Boss programme encourages sex, obscenity, and immorality. This show should be cancelled right away.

"This show is being broadcast straight without censorship... and pregnancy tests are being performed on the women who are taking part in it." Such broadcasts are only permitted between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m., according to the guidelines. On the contrary, it begins broadcasting at 9 p.m. Gundala Sivaprasad Reddy, the petitioner's lawyer, alleged that the Censor Board is taking no action.

However, the High Court responded to the petitioner's counsel's arguments. "Recently, the organisers have created such conflicts in order to gain exposure. Is this one of the lawsuits filed as part of it? "" inquired the judge. She stated that before they solve the case, they will watch the Bigg Boss show to gain some knowledge. The petitioner's attorney responded that they had not requested publicity and requested that notifications be served on the respondents. The bench, which stated that no notifications could be issued at this time, deferred the next hearing until the 27th of this month.

Tags Archive

Related Posts