Three Important Facts About Dr. Martin Luther King

A civil rights movement of resistance against racial segregation and anti-Blackness in the United States was started by Baptist minister Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., whose immense influence and profound impact extended far beyond the walls of his Montgomery, Alabama, church. Today, America honours his immeasurable legacy.

Over the years, Dr. King's accomplishments and life story have been shared as a source of motivation to promote harmony and equity among various racial groups. In contrast, Dr. King has been presented as a peaceful preacher and civil rights activist who merely encouraged tolerance and compassion for those who engage in racism and White supremacist society.

However, this portrayal does not reflect his changing viewpoints as they changed with regard to racism and demonstrations. Many contend that this was done in order to influence how future Black protests and social movements would be perceived and, ultimately, to stigmatise, police, and condemn responses to racism that are not based in empathy and love for those who practise or support racism and White supremacy in America. The history and beliefs of Dr. King, according to some historians, have also been rewritten to make racism more acceptable to black Americans.

Many historical accounts of Dr. King's life also leave out the vicious FBI persecution of him and the suffering it caused him and his family. These historical revisions and blatant omissions, which are taught in school textbooks and passed down as "wives' stories," have changed the course of history and continue to linger today. These three lesser-known facts about Dr. King are worth noting.

1. Dr. King was the target of an FBI attack. The FBI ran a planned and focused operation to disparage Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and his work from the March on Washington in 1963 until his assassination in 1968. J. Edgar Hoover's "obsession" with "destroying" Dr. King has been investigated in a number of well-known documentaries, including MLK/FBI. The FBI's anti-King operation got underway. wiretaps and gradually worsened, exposing personal information about his life and immorality. Eventually, Hoover sent King an anonymous letter with some of their cassettes, urging that he commit suicide. Hoover had also paid others to spy on King.

The FBI would learn that King planned to meet in a number of hotels for both professional and social occasions, and they would enter the hotel before King did. The hotel staff would let them in and give them permission to bug those rooms as well as the ones next door, allowing them to keep an eye on what was happening when King and his cronies entered their rooms and listen in on conversations. Alarmingly, the FBI promptly followed King to those places after learning of his plans to meet there in order to start watching and eavesdropping the conversations that took place within those rooms.

Hoover's fixation is thought to have been sparked by an unfounded worry that King might turn communist. His objective was to gather personal information on King so that he could reveal it to the media and damage his standing as a Christian preacher. Despite his best efforts, the FBI's conclusions were never reported by the media. Many contend that Hoover's campaign against Dr. King was motivated by his hatred for the fact that King was a highly intelligent, popular, and prominent black man working to advance equal rights for blacks in the Jim Crow South.

2. King-related informants were enlisted by the FBI. Ernest Withers, a black photographer who was well-liked by SCLC participants and who captured many of the famous and iconic images of the civil rights movement, worked as an informant for the FBI. Although Withers did not begin as an informant, the FBI rapidly set him up to work against King when Withers gained notoriety for his photographs that captured the civil rights movement.

3. Over time, King's opinions on violence and dissent shifted. Abolitionist activities were backed by Dr. King, who also realised the power of legislative measures to advance fairness for blacks. It is true that Dr. King advocated tolerance and love and concentrated heavily on individuals. In actuality, his Civil Rights Movement was an abolitionist movement, and his speeches like "Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution" and his sermon at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. demonstrate how acutely aware he was of racism's deep roots in American culture.

Dr. King's views on violence and demonstrations started to shift over time. At the end of his life, this was particularly true. King has started to research and criticise international issues, strongly condemning the Vietnam War and putting a greater emphasis on economic fairness. Urban regions with a majority of black population continued to be marginalised by the institutions that were supposed to elevate and defend them. The need for change was intense and at its peak.

Dr. King was starting to see this conflict. By the end of the year, King was struggling with the hurt, anguish, and frustration felt by many of the younger black civil rights activists. Dr. King stated that while the majority of black Americans still supported peaceful resistance, a sizable portion of the black community was now supporting violent resistance in a contentious discussion with Mike Wallace for 60 Minutes.
"A riot is the language of the unheard," he said, placing the violent outburst in greater context. He also stated that the upcoming summers will see increased bloodshed. It was clear by 1967 that King was still debating whether violent protests were ever justified.

In contrast to his talk of riots just a year earlier, he now depicted violence at his lecture at the American Psychology Association's annual meeting in Washington, DC, almost as a necessary act. It's true that Dr. King may not have been as forceful as his younger forerunners had hoped. Nevertheless, he had realised by the time he spoke in the fall of 1967 that telling black Americans to simply demonstrate in a nonviolent, polite, and respectful manner would no longer be a viable option.

Some social scientists contend that the real tragedy of King's legacy is that many of the White people who frequently invoke his legacy in the name of peace do so with a fundamental perversion of his message. This is in addition to the incorrectly attributed quotes, patronising memes, and poor justification for color-blind ideologies made in his name. Nonviolence is frequently only explored and enforced in response to any revolt of the poor and marginalised, when it is debated and fetishized. Riots have their own language, a language of double talk, despite the fact that they are a language.

The request is for love and peace, but what is really needed is total stillness. As the nation considers the enormous influence of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., many people wish that it is done honestly, taking into account his viewpoints and the nasty attacks that were planned against him.